![]() ![]() but the same should be true of whatever the next big bandwidth user is.Īll of this gets a bit fuzzy in the real world, though.įor example: CDNs. So, sure, if some new streaming site pops up, it should get the same treatment as Netflix or Hulu. The point of net neutrality isn't just to avoid specific monopoly abuses, it's to enable innovation. And, arguably, the audio is especially sensitive ideally, you'd prefer to drop video frames instead of audio. You could still call it video streaming, but it's a lot more latency-sensitive. One obvious example, lately, is video conferencing. ![]() Because how do you know what's streaming video in the first place? And what happens when some new application comes along, how does it get ISPs to prioritize it appropriately? That's definitely why people care about net neutrality, but I think shaping can still be a problem. Here's a more detailed guide for what can and cannot use the service. (For example, some books have a couple pages in the back that advertise other books by the author or publisher, or a film DVD might have trailers for a couple other films.) There are rules that prohibit advertising to be shipped via this method, other than incidental advertising that's part of the media.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |